Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Minutes of the May 16, 2013 Special Budget Workshop of the Board



MINUTES OF THE BUDGET WORKSHOP
OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
IRONHOUSE SANITARY DISTRICT

May 16, 2013

The Ironhouse Sanitary District (ISD) Board of Directors met in Special Session to hold a Budget Workshop on Thursday, May 16, 2013.

The place of meeting was the Ironhouse Sanitary District Office at 450 Walnut Meadows Drive, Oakley, California.  The meeting was called to order by President Lauritzen at 6:04 p.m.

 1.      Call to Order  
Roll Call:

Pledge of Allegiance            Led by Doug Scheer

Members present:               David Contreras, David Huerta, Chris Lauritzen, Michael Painter and Doug Scheer

Members absent:                none

Staff/Consultants present:     Tom Williams, General Manager
Joe Mueller, Environmental / Process Compliance Manager
Susan Walde, District Secretary
Michael Welty, Utonomy, Inc.
Marc Haefke, O & M Superintendent

Interested parties present:     Josh Roden, Brookfield Homes
Dave Best, Shea Homes

 2.      Public CommentThere were no comments from the public in attendance.

 3.      BUSINESS BEFORE THE BOARD

A.    Reconsideration of Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Issuance of an Administrative Civil Liability Complaint.
Mr. Tom Williams reviewed the Agenda item prepared by Ms. Skrel who was not able to attend this evening.  He reviewed the earlier distributed email received from the Water board as additional information to the Board. 
Director Contreras stated that at the last Board meeting he had asked staff to contact the Water Board regarding the fine amount.  Mr. Williams responded that Ms. Skrel has been in contact with them.  Director Contreras stated that he is concerned about their interpretation of the water code regarding fines and, sometimes agencies need to decide if it’s in their interest to challenge the staff interpretation at the Water Board Level.  While you must always work with the Water Board staff, you can also seek clarification through the Water Board if you feel strongly enough about the issue.  Regarding this issue, Director Contreras indicated he is not recommending seeking clarification through the water Board.
M/S D. Contreras, M. Painter and the Board voted unanimously to authorize the General Manager to sign the waiver form for Administrative Civil Liability Complaint and issue a check in the amount of $3,000 to the State Water Pollution Cleanup and Abatement Account.

4.       ISD DRAFT BUDGET WORKSHOP FOR YEAR 2013-2014

Mr. Tom Williams welcomed everyone and thanked them for attending the meeting.  He introduced Mr. Welty and specified that Mr. Welty will be working with the budget document on the overhead and can make interactive changes. 

Director Contreras and Director Huerta stated that this is the 5th rendition on the budget and it is still a work in progress for the finance committee.  He stated the committee would like to meet again before bringing the budget to the Board for formal approval.

Mr. Williams stated that working with the finance committee, they have worked to keep the budget flat at a rate of $618 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU).  The budget does not provide for funding for any Capital Expenditure Reserve (formally the Replacement Reserve).  The district will be able to fund the $650,000 normally received from the annual sewer service charge with carry forward revenue from the current budget and other funds, including an anticipated payment of a $240,000 refundable deposit from RD 830 for the purchase of dirt for the Marsh Creek Enhancement Project.

Mr. Williams is also working on the Koff study update (Total Compensation Study) but the proposed budget does not currently allocate any funds to make adjustments based on the ultimate results of the study update.  The proposed budget does allow for a cost of living adjustment, up to 3 %.

Another factor considered in the proposed budget is the upcoming reset of the trunkline and plant capacity fee discounts at the end of September 2013.  The fee discount, offered for two years beginning in September 2011, is set to expire and the additional revenue collected from the fee discount expiration is needed to help the District 1) keep the sewer service charge flat at $618 per EDU and 2) meet its funding test criteria for the State Water Resources Control Board’s state revolving fund loan.  Mr. Williams pointed out the anticipated additional revenue from the expiration of the fee discount is approximately $149,000.  With only $114,000 in net revenue remaining in the proposed FY 2013/14 budget after expenses, the District would either have to increase the proposed rate of $618 per EDU, or decrease expenses additionally to insure it met its mandated funding test through the State if it extended the fee discounts.
Regarding current connections at 14,525.8, the anticipated starting EDU’s for the coming fiscal year has been increased to 14,540 because another month and a half remain in the current fiscal year and staff anticipates additional new connections .  Also, the proposed budget anticipates 150 new EDU’s connecting in FY 2013/14.
Discussion was held with the placement of cattle revenue on the budget.

Josh Roden of Brookfield Homes and Dave Best of Shea Homes addressed the Board with information regarding local development:
There are currently 257 vacant lots in Oakley ready for building homes, however, once that inventory is gone (1½ to 2 years), developers may have difficulty investing in new lots and new infrastructure if permitting fees reset to previous levels.  On May 1st there was a fee summit held with the City of Oakley, CCWD, DWD and the School District regarding the fees burden to the development community.  They stated that it is important for Oakley to keep their total fees affordable to attract future development in the Oakley area. Brookfield will be developing the Emerson property and should be starting in 2014 with a 4-6 year build out for this development.  The project will be grading in 2013, pulling permits in 2014 and will have 500 plus lots to be staged out over years.
They stated that the City of Oakley made a decision to keep rates low and they are asking the Board to consider keeping the discounted rate. 
Director Contreras stated that the Board is responsible for looking out for the rate payers.  As a point of reference, Director Contreras pointed out that every $100,000 in District expenses, translates to approximately $7 a year impact per ISD ratepayer, and the ISD Board is very in tune with ratepayer impacts related to ISD expenses.
President Lauritzen thanked Mr. Roden and Mr. Best for attending and stated that starting in January 2014 the Board would start their budget review process and would like to invite them back at that time so the Board could receive an update on the development outlook. 

At 7:15 p.m. President Lauritzen called for a short recess.  At 7:20 the Board reconvened.
Mr. Williams reviewed the concerns of the developers, and the anticipated developments within the District over the next 3-5 years, including the Delta Coves project on Bethel Island, and the Oakley Generating Station on the District’s west end. 

Mr. Williams continued reviewing the Budget with the Board.
President Lauritzen stated his concern regard the $90,000 in hay sales.  He stated there is not a cost basis for the expense of the hay.  Mr. Williams said hay cost a necessity of application of our treated water, and is directly tied to the cost of operating the Water Recycling Facility. The WDR permit the District operates under through the Regional Water Quality Control Board for our land application process requires the growing and harvesting of a crop.

Mr. Welty addressed the wages, benefits and administrative expenses and stated it includes (among other things) 2 new hires in FY 2013/14 (one a replacement employee, and a new position) and a COLA of up to 3%, for a total increase of 7.7% in salary, benefits, and administration over the previous year.

President Lauritzen directed staff and stated he would like to have an administration efficiency evaluation on in-house staff and would like to see that before we hire new employees. Mr. Williams indicated the proposed budget includes anticipated costs to perform the efficiency evaluation.  

There was a review of the director pay amount which is an increase.  Mr. Williams stated it is increased due to the increase in committee meetings and conferences/training.
Director Lauritzen stated, for him, it is wonderful to have medical and dental insurance and he will combine his meetings whenever possible to save the rate payer.  Director Contreras stated that he logs many meeting and attendances as a no charge to the District and stated other districts are being paid a higher compensation for meetings.  For our District to be leaders in the industry the Director’s need to be involved.  President Lauritzen asked the Board for continued documentation of work each Board member is involved in.

Director Huerta asked about the increase in dental insurance.  Mr. Welty stated the District received a notice this week from the provider and the increase is 6.7% for FY13/14.
Director Scheer asked for clarification on temporary staffing.  Mr. Williams stated that it includes seasonal work on Jersey Island, for the maintenance staff, at the treatment facility and for records management.
Mr. Welty continued with a review of the administrative expenses by detail.

President Lauritzen asked for comments from the Finance Committee:
Director Contreras on behalf of the committee commented on the Ad Valorem tax in revenue of $175,000.  The committee would like to see a good use of the funds and establish a fund for trouble spot repairs.  Without these funds, the cost of the repairs would be charged to the rate payer.

Director Contreras asked about lab supplies reduction and asked for an explanation.  The lab went from certified lab doing many in-house tests, to certified lab doing minimal testing since the RWQCB significantly reduced the District’s sampling and testing requirements with the latest WDR permit renewal.  He asked if staff completed comparisons with companion Wastewater Treatment Plants.  Mr. Mueller provided the agencies he reviewed when considering setting up the in-house laboratory.  Mr. Mueller also stated that the lab will be certified, which will make future request for increased test certification by the State much more streamlined when the time comes.

Professional Services are reduced by 33%.  Discussion was held on the increase in accounting services and Mr. Williams stated that the proposed budget has Mr. Welty at the district approximately 7 days a month, vs. 4-5 days a month in the prior year.   Mr. Williams is increasing the expense in this category to have Mr. Welty continue to assist, at a higher level, in the financial aspects of the District, including policy development and efficiency improvements.  An example of some of the efficiencies Mr. Welty will be reviewing/developing is implementing ADP Easy Labor Management process which is a web based timesheet system. The employees will input their timesheet information electronically which will reduce duplicate payroll entries (and the potential for data entry errors), as well as allow for better real-time monitoring by the supervisors of time off requests vs. time available for each employee to utilize. 


Utilities are reduced by 13.2 percent.  Staff has made significant efficiencies at the plant and the upcoming solar project will be in place in the later part of October 2013.

Other Operating Income -President Lauritzen asked how many acres of Jersey Island we allocate to the cattle operation. Mr. Williams stated approximately 3,000 acres.
President Lauritzen stated the cost of feed is charged to the cattle operation, but we don’t charge a rental to the cattle operation for the land.  The cattle operation is a push at best. 
Mr. Welty stated we could charge rental for the land but, ISD owns the land and this would not be normal business practice.  In addition, charging the cattle operation land rental would increase overall District revenue, but, it would also equally reduce net revenue from the cattle operation, simply offsetting one another.  Mr. Welty indicated a greater expense vs. revenue financial analysis of the cattle operation could be undertaken; simply, he would need time, and a clear understanding from the Board what they were looking for. 

Capital Expenditures – Mr. Welty detailed the capital expenditures with the Board.
Director Contreras asked if we are to receive a report on the Bethel Island bridge expansion joint replacement.  Mr. Williams stated that the draft report from Brown and Caldwell is currently being reviewed and, once finalized, will be presented to the Board.

Director Contreras addressed the income from Ad Valorem and asked where the line item would show and would there be a specific line item for the expenditure.

Director Scheer wanted to clarify the proposed budget does not direct any revenue from rates toward the capital expenditure reserve, and asked how the needed revenue of $650,000 per year for future expenditures would be funded.  Mr. Welty stated that the plan for FY 2013/14 was to move royalty reserves (approximately $460,000) into the capital expenditures reserve and any future income from the gas wells would go there as well.  In addition, Mr. Williams pointed out that in FY 2013/14, 4 additional years into the future, the RD 830 Marsh Creek Enhancement Project, and the purchase of up to 600,000 cubic yards of dirt for approximately $2.5 million, is also a key component of funding the capital expenditure reserve for the next 4 years.

President Lauritzen reminded the Board that they transferred funds from the Royalty Reserves in years past to help fund the building of the Treatment plant to reduce overall borrowing for the project, resulting in lower loan payments for the rate payers. 

President Lauritzen thanked the Finance Committee for their hard work and asked for finishing comments.

Director Contreras stated that at the last CSDA session on pension reform they were advised to watch for future increases in both the District’s contribution amounts for CalPERS costs, and CalPERS OPEB (Other Post Employment Benefits; medical benefits in retirement) costs starting in fiscal year 2015/16.  There will be changes in the GASB (Governmental Accounting Standards Board) criteria for accounting methodologies for unfunded liabilities and, how the new standards for accounting will differ from what the District actually pays CalPERS.   He stated the District’s CalPERS rates will go up 5-10% in 5 years, starting in FY 2015/16.  He wanted staff to be aware there will be training available in November 2013 on these changes.
The “classic” members in the CalPERS retirement program (existing employees prior to January 2013) will remain the same, but new members’ without reciprocity from another agency will be 2% at 62 and the new employee will be responsible for 4% of employee share of contribution into CalPERS.

President Lauritzen thanked everyone for working so hard on the budget.  He thanked Mr. Welty and stated he did a great job of presenting the document and how it is broken out into individual areas of operation. He did state that he is nervous about Jersey Island.  He is concerned that the Island costs the rate payer $100 per year to operate. 
The salaries to operate the Island are over $1 million, with reimbursement from RD830, and the revenue from cattle sales, it is still over a $2 million budget with a $145 cost to the rate payer.  This is a concern to him and he wants the Board to be aware of.

Mr. Williams stated that the Jersey Island Management Plan is in the budget to work on this coming fiscal year.  He will review starting this process with the J.I. Management Committee.  He also wanted to remind the Board that the permit with the RWQCB is based on utilizing the island for recycled water application. 

5.       Adjournment
President Lauritzen adjourned the Workshop meeting at 9:05 p.m. to Tuesday, June 2, 2013 at 7:00 p.m. for the next scheduled regular meeting, in the Ironhouse Sanitary District offices at 450 Walnut Meadows Drive, Oakley, California.


No comments:

Post a Comment